Hi
Elaine
As explained re telephone conversation. The original print supplied was made as a result of scanning the negative and outputting the image via a digital machine onto photographic paper.
As we were instructed to produce a hand print we were unable to match the supplied print as the colours and contrast on this type of digital print are greatly enhanced by the machine used.
I will return a test strip with your negative and sample print to show you the problems we encountered.
Bryan O'Leary
As explained re telephone conversation. The original print supplied was made as a result of scanning the negative and outputting the image via a digital machine onto photographic paper.
As we were instructed to produce a hand print we were unable to match the supplied print as the colours and contrast on this type of digital print are greatly enhanced by the machine used.
I will return a test strip with your negative and sample print to show you the problems we encountered.
Bryan O'Leary
Unfortunately I couldn't get my image handprinted at the Artful Dodgers as somehow the negative was scanned wrong and the colours were changed. These are two photos to show the difference between the negative
and the scan. I am not sure how this massive difference happened, as I scanned them
in properly (choosing the right film, not editing etc). The difference between the
images is that the scan has come out very red – something I love about the photo
– whereas the hand print has more realistic colours to it – a browny grey.
After having seen the hand print, I have decided to stick
with how I scanned in the photo. Although the colours in the hand print are more
realistic to what I took a photo of, the redness of the photo is partially why I
love it. I think it also better to stick with the scan as it fits in the with the
sequence of the three photos and finally I feel it better portrays my concept. It’s
about confusion and beauty. The colours from the hand print make it very obvious
as to what you’re looking at. The redness makes it more abstract and confusing, but also more
beautiful and special.
This is why I have decided to stick with the scanned image rather
than the hand print. I do not want to sacrifice the outcome of my photo if
the only reason is for it to be hand printed.
I went to The Vault
in Brighton today to get my scanned images printed.
As explained earlier, I wanted to stick to my scanned image rather than getting
it hand printed. I decided to get it printed A2, mainly as that’s all I can afford
at the moment. It will come to £32, although the mounting will be another £45. I’m
very excited to see the outcome of it. I was shown a different photo mounted on
Diabond and it looks fantastic and incredibly professional.
I am only getting
the red motion blur image printed A2 and mounted, and the other two photos in the
series will be A3. Luckily I only need to have one image professionally presented
and mounted, and the other two can be a smaller size (although still professionally
done but not mounted).
No comments:
Post a Comment