The thing that stood out to me the most about my set
brief project was the scientific aspect of it. I mentioned in my workbook
various times that I really enjoyed Environmental Science at school and thus
combining photography with a scientific subject matter was a great way to get
me passionate about the work. In order to be equally passionate about this
project I want to have a similar scientific approach. However, instead of landscapes, I want to put a greater focus on the specific species of plants
that are in Horsell Common. The photos will become an annotated scientific
documentation of the plant species. I’m hoping to particularly look at rare
species, or unique plants, rather than documenting the obvious. I want the book
to be interesting and include unique photographs of the plants.
In my time lapse I will be idealising the area, but
again I want to maintain the scientific aspect to my project. It will almost be
like a documentary of Horsell Common, although there will be no narration. For
my previous time lapse I used quite straightforward landscape shots similar to
my final images, however for this project I want to focus both on the landscape
as well as more detailed shots of the plant life. The majority of time lapses I
have viewed make use of a camera slider, and therefore, instead of having still
scenes, I will use a camera slider to make the video more interesting.
Photography used to be seen as a technology, not as
art. There was an assumption that all images were accurate and dispassionate.
It was a way of keeping a record for anyone who needs “absolute material
accuracy for professional reasons” (Baudelaire 1859). Photography was only used
to document something in a factual manner, “she [photography] is the sworn witness
of everything presented to her view” (Eastlake 1857). Because photography was
seen to be so accurate, it was used for classifications. I am returning to the
factual documentation of photography and therefore will have to do a lot of
research into the origins of photography and the technological side of it,
rather than the artistic side. Liz Wells’s Photography:
A Critical Introduction is a great start. Wells writes about how people
started to differentiate between the technological and artistic side by purposely
taking shots that were “out of focus, slightly blurred and fuzzy” (Wells,
2004).
No comments:
Post a Comment